Toronto group’s affiliates again criticize farm subsidies

Regional Country News

June 21, 2002

NB: The conversion of this document to a digital format may have introduced errors. To see the document in its original form, click here.

"Subsidizing farmers has backfired in Canada," says Lawrence Solomon, one of the authors of a report released last week by a Saskatchewan-based [editor’s note: URI is in fact based in Toronto] research institute, which is a division of Toronto environmental group Energy Probe. 

Energy Probe is also affiliated with Environment Probe, an organization which recently sent out a fundraising letter slam­ming Ontario’s farmers for polluting the environ­ment, living off the avails of subsidies, and hiding behind exemptions in environmental protection laws.
Solomon wrote the most recent report, enti­tled “Agricultural Subsidies in Canada: 1992-2001”, along with Carrie Elliot for the Urban Renaissance Institute. Available on the agency’s website, the report asserts that, "over 10 years, the federal and provincial governments supplied approximately $3.53 in agricultural subsidies for every dollar earned by a Canadian farmer, (yet) no province operated a prof­itable farm economy over the past decade."
The report provides statistics showing Ontario’s agricultural sector is the most heavily subsidized among provinces in Canada, fol­lowed by Alberta, Quebec and Nova Scotia. A large part of this, according to the authors, is the sup­port of supply manage­ment systems for dairy and other products.
Solomon and Elliot sug­gest the report "under­states the direct and indi­rect financial assistance that Canadian farmers receive" and "excludes the subsidy that farmers receive through property tax concessions," which they call "substantial."
The website for the Urban Renaissance Institute states the agency "is dedicated to helping cities and their regions flourish by removing the many impediments to their proper functioning," and includes goals such as "to measure and reveal the wealth that cities gener­ate" and "to demonstrate why sound urban policies are indispensable to wilderness and farmland protection."
Also on the website, internet surfers are urged to vote on the question, "Do you sup­port eliminating farm subsidies that help large farms but hurt small ones?" As of Monday, June 17, 79 people had apparently voted, with 52 per cent answering "yes" and 48 per cent respond­ing "no.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s