Trees in the city

Elizabeth Brubaker
The Globe and Mail: Letters to the Editor
June 2, 1995

NB: This document has been made available through a digital transferring program, and some errors may have occurred. Click here to view the original document in PDF form.

Toronto City Council could not have thought up a surer way to destroy the urban forest than to pass a bylaw forbidding property owners to sell trees without the city’s permission (Columnist Breaks Law, Kills Tree – May 19).
With a stroke of a pen, council has turned big trees – once valuable assets – into liabilities. It has given property owners an incentive to immediately cut down trees under 30 centimeters in diameter, just in case they might someday want to build an addition, grow flowers or vegetables, or sell their home. It has given amateurs reason to poison larger trees, with untold environmental harm. Likewise, it has discouraged even avid tree lovers from planting maples, oaks or other large shade trees in favour of safer – read smaller – alternatives.
Property rights have long served to protect our forests, urban and rural alike. Private owners have demonstrated that, on the whole, they value their trees and don’t cut them down lightly. Depriving citizens of their property rights by turning their backyards into a city-run commons creates perverse incentives and can only lead to tragic consequences for those concerned about the quality of urban life.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s